from least appealing(left) to most appealing (right) - sorry, I defined my own system for it
intelligence tests are highly overrated....
hmm, how many more reasonable ways can we arrange these words?
I agree with darkjustice. It like those ink blot tests...how can the way a decipher an inkblot determine if i am crazy and who came up with the guidlines for them and who determines that they are right in the first place
fight argue debate discuss converse banter ignore
banter might not go there since i don't know its definition and 30 seconds wasn't enough time to run it through dictioanry.com
converse discuss debate argue banter fight ignore
the stages of conflict, it seems like it deals with personality more than intelligence
Comments (10)
Alphabetical seems logical to me:
argue, banter, converse, debate, discuss, fight, ignore
converse, discuss, banter, debate, argue, fight, ignore
converse, discuss, debate, argue, fight, banter, ignore
Although logic is my stronghold, I can't think properly today.
Here's what I thought, and, as you can see, no answer is the same as any other. Hehe, that means we're all intelligent?
ignore banter converse discuss debate argue fight
It's the continuum of growing interaction between disagreeing parties who waver between healthy and unhealthy disagreement, or something like that.
To my knowledge, there is no "correct" answer.
fight, argue,ignore, debate, discuss, converse, banter
from least appealing(left) to most appealing (right) - sorry, I defined my own system for it
intelligence tests are highly overrated....
hmm, how many more reasonable ways can we arrange these words?
I agree with darkjustice. It like those ink blot tests...how can the way a decipher an inkblot determine if i am crazy and who came up with the guidlines for them and who determines that they are right in the first place
fight argue debate discuss converse banter ignore
banter might not go there since i don't know its definition and 30 seconds wasn't enough time to run it through dictioanry.com
converse discuss debate argue banter fight ignore
the stages of conflict, it seems like it deals with personality more than intelligence
Comments are closed.